The archaeologists carefully lifted the lid of the sarcophogus by twenty centimeters, a laborious process which took fourteen hours. Inside they found the remains of a woman lying on her back. Her skeleton was covered and surrounded by a large collection of jade and pearlobjects, bone needles and shells, which were originally pieces of necklaces, earspools and wristlets. Around the skull was a diadem made of flat circular jade beads, and the malachite pieces of what had been a funeral mask. In the chest area of the skeleton were more flat jade beads and four obsidian blades. In addition, there was a tiny limestone figurine inside a seashell.
The skeleton, the collection of objects and the inside of the sarcophogus were entirely covered with a bright red dust made of cinnabar, or the ground ore of mercury.[3]
Historic pigments in the Straus Center collection
at Harvard Art Museums, which is reopening this Sunday
(photograph by Zak Jensen,
all images courtesy Harvard Art Museums)
When the Harvard Art Museums reopen this Sunday after a six-year expansion project, historic pigments foundational to the field of art conservation in the United States will be on public view. A new display will showcase the Forbes Pigment Collection as part of the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies.
The laboratory, as WBUR reported this week, is a component of the merger of Harvard’s three art museums — Fogg, Busch-Reisinger, and Arthur M. Sackler — into one complex. Through glass walls visitors can see scientific conservation in process, which goes back to the Fogg’s founding in 1927 and pioneer conservationist and director Edward Waldo Forbes. While collecting art around the world for the new museum, Forbes got intrigued by how paintings were made, and why some deteriorated. Gradually and then obsessively he amassed a collection of painting pigments, many of which are displayed in their original glass containers on a wall of the Straus Center.
“It was put together by Edward Forbes in an attempt to understand the material nature of works of art, and that approach to understanding art had not been taken before,” Senior Conservation Scientist Narayan Khandekar told Hyperallergic over the phone. “It was the beginning of the scientific approach for conservation in the United States.”
Edward Waldo Forbes & Paul J. Sachs with bust of Victor Hugo (1944) (photograph by George Woodruff, courtesy Harvard Art Museums Archives)
Later Forbes hired scientist Rutherford John Gettens, who examined the chemistry of pigments and innovated tools like a microsampler for taking art specimens. Now conservators can examine how a color has changed over time — like pararealgar, that was originally red and reacted with light into yellow — and the original components of art through the pigment library.
Only a small part of the collection was on view in the original building. Now they’re assembled in white cabinets based on the color wheel, with yellow at the center going out to blue and purple and beyond. Khandekar noted the pigments are often standards for historic colors (an online database of them is used by conservators across the globe). For example, one of the yellows was integral to recent research on a Georges Seurat work.
“It was before he was painting with all these little dots, and in it, we found these pigments, these tiny bright yellow needles,” Khandekar explained. “I said that it looked like Indian yellow and we had a sample of it and we were able to compare it, and it was the same.” That Indian yellow, while available in 19th century France and used by Seurat for its intense color, was banned by the British government as it was made from the dried urine of cows fed just mango leaves, and deemed cruel to the animals.
Alongside the thousands of pigment samples are materials used to make them, like the semi-precious stone ground up for the vibrantly blue lapis lazuli, and scientists at the center are still adding contemporary pigments to the collection. There are also other components of the materials of art, like binding media and geological samples related to classical sculpture. And it’s just one aspect of the rebranded museum opening up its history and resources after the years of closure. “It’s part of the museum becoming a more transparent institution,” Khandekar said.
Narayan Khandekar, senior conservation scientist at the
Harvard Art Museums, installs the pigment collection in the
Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies (
photograph by Antoinette Hocbo)
Historic pigments at the Straus Center
(photograph by Peter Vanderwarker)
The pigments in the collection come from all over the world, a
and some are stored in their original delicate glass containers
(photograph by Zak Jensen)
The Harvard Art Museums, during renovation and expansion,
showing the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies (photograph by Zak Jensen)
Harvard Art Museums (32 Quincy Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts) reopen this Sunday, November 16.
When I was 8 and on holiday in France with my parents, we went to Chartres Cathedral, just south of Paris. My father took me by the hand as we both stared at the blue glass casting reflections all over the limestone in the great medieval church.
FROM THIS STORY
“That blue was made 800 years ago,” he said. “And we can’t make it like that any more.”
From that moment on I was fascinated—obsessed you could say—by colors. Not just by what effect they have on the eye (though for me any encounter with a new piece of art is almost always about the colors first), but also by their history and, of course, how they were and are made. For, as I learned, colors are amazing and complex things. Even the purest and brightest natural colors like madder-root orange are actually blends of many colors when viewed under the microscope: yellow, red, even blue and white. Chemical colors (so much less delightful!) often are just one.
I recently spent five weeks at the Getty Museum, walking the galleries with a large magnifying glass in hand and talking to experts about the different paints and processes. The Brilliant History of Color in Art, the book I just wrote with the Museum, follows paints and dyes and pigments through time, from the manganese black used in the prehistoric cave paintings at Lascaux in France to the tiny dots of light, pixels, that create color on our computer screens.
My quest for color has landed me in all sorts of adventures. I traveled to eastern Iran for the two weeks in November when the landscape is purple with saffron crocuses harvested for their scented
red stigmas. I went twice to Afghanistan during wartime, the second time reaching the remote mountains where for 6,000 years people have mined the lapis lazuli stone that gives the astonishing purplish blue of Titian’s skies and the Virgin Mary’s robes.
Saint George and the Dragon, about 1450–55, Master of Guillebert de Mets. Tempera colors, gold leaf paint, and ink on parchment, 7 5/8 x 5 1/2 in. (The J. Paul Getty Museum, Ms. 2, fol. 18v, gold )
Over the years I’ve seen my share of medieval stained glass windows in churches, cathedrals, and museums. I’ve even found and picked up tiny colored shards of glass on the ground outside churches in my native England. These shards had been lying in the dirt since the dark days of what we rather kindly call the Reformation of the 1530s, when some of the country’s most beautiful sacred art objects were smashed in obedience to King Henry VIII.
But I’d never done more than touch a fragment of stained glass until a few weeks ago, when I visited the Stained Glass Studio at Canterbury Cathedral in Kent in southern England. Conservators at the Cathedral had taken down this pane featuring the Biblical figure of Methuselah in his 12th-century glory, along with 42 other depictions of Christ’s ancestors as part of extensive cathedral renovations. This work became necessary when the glass in the southeast transept window started to fall out after weathering 800 years of wind and rain. Five of these over-life-sized glass figures were in a glorious exhibition at the Getty Center in 2013.
Installation view of stained glass windows from Canterbury Cathedral in Canterbury and St. Albans (at the Getty Center, September 20, 2013 to February 2, 2014). (Stained glass courtesy Dean and Chapter of Canterbury)
I used to think “stained glass” got its name because it’s so colorful. But I learned during the early years of my research that, instead, it is because some colored glass panes are overpainted with a metallic stain to depict faces, fabric folds, and other details, and then baked in a kiln. The staining can be damaged by the slightest touch.
Not all colored glass is truly stained, however. “Do you want to touch one of the unpainted pieces?” asked Leonie Seliger, head of the stained glass conservation department, pointing to panes in which the color comes from the glass itself, not from the painstaking, and vulnerable, surface stain.
I tentatively reached out my fingers to a piece of glass––a blue one, of course. I closed my eyes. The surface was like a smooth wave. Imagine touching a distant landscape of rolling hills and tracing your finger across the horizon. At a distance the glass looked flat, but it was far from it.
She showed me the replacement handblown glass she had prepared for restoration, organized in stacks by color. The sheets were flat.
“We’ve been desperately trying to find someone who can handblow glass unevenly,” she said. “But they’re all too good. We haven’t found anyone yet.”
Yet it is this uneven surface, and the impurities that were mixed with the coloring elements—cobalt for blue, manganese for purple, gold for pure red—that make the shimmers that have captivated me for years, going back to that day at Chartres.
The stories of colors burst with improbable details. Vivid red comes from cochineal, extracted from South American bugs whose brilliant red pigment was once so valuable that people danced in the streets when they arrived twice a year into the port of Seville. Lead white—now banned for toxicity in the U.S.—was derived from lead corroded through contact with acid and manure. Prussian blue was created by accident when an alchemist tried to make red. And all the “coaltar” colors with
which most of our clothes are dyed today were discovered by a teenager who made a mistake in his chemistry homework.
There is a common thread in the whole history of color in art, as I saw in those cathedral windows that first started me on this lifelong journey: the vital role played by imperfection, accident, and vulnerability in the striving for perfection. The windows of Chartres were made 800 years ago by itinerant craftsmen who traveled from cathedral to cathedral, living close to forests to have ample supplies of wood, and who no doubt told stories as they made their bumpy glass, full of dust motes and bits of leaves—imperfections that make it all the more glorious.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/why-colors-you-see-art-museum-cant-be-replicated-today-180953332/#oKVRE7UYJwWRudKq.99 Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter Source link here.
"With the rise of cities, the wall's real enemy is not nature but other human beings who lead secretive lives on the opposite side, lives that are contiguous with ours but that we seldom see, that make their presence felt only by means of late-night quarrels, the distasteful smells of cooking, creaking box springs, and the constant murmur of flushing toilets. Overcrowding and urbanization have given the wall new meaning. Ever since the first loose stone was piled on top of another, crude partitions have delineated property and thus served as architectural extensions of our sense of identity, a way of saying to our enemies "mine," a deed of ownership we sign in bricks and mortar. As we are herded together by overpopulation and are forced to abandon the luxury of detached dwellings for small apartments, the architectural ramparts of our identities are besieged by the madding crowd, which would claim its share of the ever-dwindling space available in which to lead lives that have become more and more solitary the closer we live to each other. The poetry of paint names is based on a misanthropic aesthetic, one that pretends that our walls are not communal property, are not shared, that there is nothing behind them but the green sward, wide open spaces devoid of other people, vast horizons of Island Dawns, Arizona Sunsets, Big Skies, Mountain Forests, Pink Mesas, and Burning Sands. Paint provides us with a psychological barrier from our neighbors, a way of achieving a sense of self-containment and allowing our imaginations to revel in that most pressing desideratum of urban life—space, the empty clearings available for a song on the color preview palette." -an excerpt from the article Paint and Paint Names by Daniel Harris, Cabinet Magazine, Issue 7, Failure, Summer 2002. Link here to read full article.
Sampling of Benjamin Moore's "white" paint chips. Image source is from the article Paint and Paint Names, link above. Source is Cabinet Magazine